linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151022000452.GU19782@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:04:52 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control
 variables

On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote:
> Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control.  The means the
> pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can
> specify device tree registers for those independently.  Also, add a new
> driver flag to identify this presence of the split, and let the driver
> know that additional registers need to be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-iproc

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/