[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022120607.GD1985@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:06:07 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Pavel Nakonechny <pavel.nakonechny@...tlab.ru>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...nwrt.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6060: Fix false positive lockdep splat
> Well, mdio-mux also calls switch_fn inside the mdio_lock, clean refactoring
> would introduce a separate lock and call the nested variants.
> Is that ok ? Can someone test mdio-mux if I make the change ?
Hi Neil
I would not touch mdio-mux. As you said, it does more than lock, read,
unlock. It is not something sufficiently generic to place into shared
code.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists