[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022121000.20687.48364@quantum>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 05:10:00 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"Sjoerd Simons" <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: rockchip: Allow the RK3288 SPDIF clocks to change
their parent
Quoting Heiko Stübner (2015-10-11 03:43:27)
> Hi Sjoerd,
>
> Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 13:35:55 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 17:10 +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015, 15:31:16 schrieb Sjoerd Simons:
> > > > The clock branches leading to sclk_spdif and sclk_spdif_8ch on
> > > > RK3288
> > > > SoCs only feed those clocks, allow those clocks to change their
> > > > parents
> > > > all the way up the hierarchy.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Just as comment, if I'm seeing that right, this patch needs "clk:
> > > rockchip:
> > > handle mux dependency of fractional dividers" and friends [0] to
> > > apply and
> > > also actually handle the fractional dividers correctly.
> > >
> > > For the clock change itself:
> > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> >
> > Oh sorry yes, i completely forgot to at that as note on this patch
> > (series). These are on top of your series as those are required to make
> > things actually work as expected.
> >
> > Which reminds me, i was wondering how to best move that forward. Could
> > you pick this one up to include it in the next round of your series?
> > (Otherwise i'm happy to rebase it once you do a v2)
>
> I guess that will depend on how the core series gets handled. Aka if there
> needs to be a v2 (depending on the clock maintainers) I can pick that up as
> part of it. Otherwise we'll just need to ping the clock-maintainers separately
> on this patch if necessary.
I've spoken with Heiko on irc about v2 about using the coordinated clock
rates patches for handling the mux/fractional dividers thing. I'd prefer
to use the ccr approach, which puts a delay on that series.
Is there anything wrong with merging this patch #5/8 as-is? Will the
struct clk_core.rate accounting not match the hardware if we set
CLK_SET_PARENT_RATE on these clocks?
Regards,
Mike
>
>
> Heiko
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists