[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022140307.GG32514@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:03:07 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] perf tools: Defaults to 'caller' callchain order
only if --children is enabled
Em Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:49:11AM -0700, Brendan Gregg escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The caller callchain order is useful with --children option since it can
> >>> show 'overview' style output, but other commands which don't use
> >>> --children feature like 'perf script' or even 'perf report/top' without
> >>> --children are better to keep caller order.
> >
> > Oops, there's a typo: s/caller order/callee order/ :)
>
> Thanks, I was wondering about that (and I've made that typo myself).
> Thanks for the patch!
Brendan, can I take that as an Acked-by?
> Brendan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists