[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022140944.GA30579@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:09:44 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
mhocko@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, oleg@...hat.com,
kwalker@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov@...allels.com, skozina@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()
checks
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:39:11AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> > The problem would be that the "struct task_struct" to execute vmstat_update
> > job does not exist, and will not be able to create one on demand because we
> > are stuck at __GFP_WAIT allocation. Therefore adding a dedicated kernel
> > thread for vmstat_update job would work. But ...
>
> Yuck. Can someone please get this major screwup out of the work queue
> subsystem? Tejun?
Hmmm? Just use a dedicated workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM. If
concurrency management is a problem and there's something live-locking
for that work item (really?), WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE escapes it. If this is
a common occurrence that it makes sense to give vmstat higher
priority, set WQ_HIGHPRI.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists