[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL2MjN9_K5tBOEAnM7j5SXzipXXcBMUyyUacaFnpVOOJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:34:11 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: earlycon: allow to specify uartclk in
earlycon kernel-parameter
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> (+ Rob Herring, Stefan Agner)
>
> 2015-10-20 23:00 GMT+09:00 Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>:
>> On 10/19/2015 11:36 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> The input clock frequency varies from device to device, but the
>>> earlycon uses the fixed frequency (BASE_BAUD * 16). It makes
>>> impossible to set the correct divisor to the register.
>>
>> So the bootloader hasn't setup the serial port?
>
> It does.
> I use U-boot and the serial port is already set up by U-boot.
This problem is now moving into u-boot which is using DT for configuration.
> But, earlycon setup functions update hardware registers.
> See early_serial8250_setup(), ingenic_early_console_setup(), etc.
>
>
> Without port->uartclk set to a valid value,
> the init code in earlycon setup does not make sense.
>
>
> What I want to clarify is,
> what should we do in the earlycon setup function?
>
> Currently, I see
> [1] set device->con->write callback
> [2] initialize UART port registers
>
>
> For [2], we need to know baudrate and input clock frequency.
> (and the latter is missing, that's why my patch is here.)
I'm missing context of what you did, but it needs to be parse-able
from a flattened tree. My suggestion would be use clock-frequency
property in the uart node. We should be able to parse that. This came
up with u-boot as well[1].
> In order to be independent of a boot loader, we also need
> [3] pinctrl (pin-muxing)
We have to draw the line somewhere and I think this falls below it.
What if we have to turn on a regulator for the pins or RS-232
transceiver, turn on power domain, take peripheral out of reset, and
the list goes on... Hopefully a debug path would never be that
complicated.
> But, it is difficult to handle pinctrl in the earlycon framework.
earlycon is for debug. Either fix your bootloader or you need some
platform specific setup hacks to get the h/w in a working state if you
need to debug.
Rob
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/492697/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists