linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: consider missed ticks in full NOHZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151022162031.GA28099@lerouge>
Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:20:33 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	byungchul.park@....com
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: consider missed ticks in full NOHZ

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 06:47:36PM +0900, byungchul.park@....com wrote:
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> 
> Even though the cpu is non-idle when its tick is stoped in full NOHZ,
> current "update_cpu_load" code considers as if the cpu has been idle
> unconditionally. It's wrong. This patch makes the "update_cpu_load"
> code know if the calling path comes from full NOHZ or idle NOHZ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>

ACK.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/