lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022163623.GA51514@jaegeuk-mac02.mot.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:36:23 -0700
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: refactor __find_rev_next_{zero}_bit

Hi Chao,

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:24:01PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 6:30 AM
> > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: refactor __find_rev_next_{zero}_bit
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:16:43PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > This patch refactors __find_rev_next_{zero}_bit which was disabled previously
> > > due to bugs.
> 
> Actually I didn't know the history here, could you please explain details
> about the bugs? then I can do the review.

When I disabled the existing function by:

commit e19ef527aa32f057710ec842fe656bffc263b0bb
Author: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Date:   Mon May 18 11:45:15 2015 -0700

    f2fs: avoid buggy functions

I found a mismatch of results between the existing __find_rev_next_bit and
f2fs_test_bit work. I remember it happened on __find_rev_next_bit sometimes
by xfstests which include trim_fs.
(I didn't get an error from __find_rev_zero_bit though.)

Since I have no time to investigate the bug in more detail at that time, I
just disabled it. But, now I'm trying to refactor the flow to fix this.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > index f37c212..50afc93 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,21 @@ static struct kmem_cache *discard_entry_slab;
> > >  static struct kmem_cache *sit_entry_set_slab;
> > >  static struct kmem_cache *inmem_entry_slab;
> > >
> > > +static unsigned long __reverse_ulong(unsigned char *str)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned long tmp = 0;
> > > +	int shift = 24, idx = 0;
> > > +
> > > +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > > +	shift = 56;
> > > +#endif
> > > +	while (shift >= 0) {
> > > +		tmp |= (unsigned long)str[idx++] << shift;
> > > +		shift -= BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > > +	}
> > > +	return tmp;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * __reverse_ffs is copied from include/asm-generic/bitops/__ffs.h since
> > >   * MSB and LSB are reversed in a byte by f2fs_set_bit.
> > > @@ -38,27 +53,31 @@ static inline unsigned long __reverse_ffs(unsigned long word)
> > >  	int num = 0;
> > >
> > >  #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > > -	if ((word & 0xffffffff) == 0) {
> > > +	if ((word & 0xffffffff00000000) == 0)
> > 
> > I fixed the sparse warning by modifying:
> > 	if ((word & 0xffffffff00000000UL) == 0)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > >  		num += 32;
> > > +	else
> > >  		word >>= 32;
> > > -	}
> > >  #endif
> > > -	if ((word & 0xffff) == 0) {
> > > +	if ((word & 0xffff0000) == 0)
> > >  		num += 16;
> > > +	else
> > >  		word >>= 16;
> > > -	}
> > > -	if ((word & 0xff) == 0) {
> > > +
> > > +	if ((word & 0xff00) == 0)
> > >  		num += 8;
> > > +	else
> > >  		word >>= 8;
> > > -	}
> > > +
> > >  	if ((word & 0xf0) == 0)
> > >  		num += 4;
> > >  	else
> > >  		word >>= 4;
> > > +
> > >  	if ((word & 0xc) == 0)
> > >  		num += 2;
> > >  	else
> > >  		word >>= 2;
> > > +
> > >  	if ((word & 0x2) == 0)
> > >  		num += 1;
> > >  	return num;
> > > @@ -68,26 +87,16 @@ static inline unsigned long __reverse_ffs(unsigned long word)
> > >   * __find_rev_next(_zero)_bit is copied from lib/find_next_bit.c because
> > >   * f2fs_set_bit makes MSB and LSB reversed in a byte.
> > >   * Example:
> > > - *                             LSB <--> MSB
> > > - *   f2fs_set_bit(0, bitmap) => 0000 0001
> > > - *   f2fs_set_bit(7, bitmap) => 1000 0000
> > > + *                             MSB <--> LSB
> > > + *   f2fs_set_bit(0, bitmap) => 1000 0000
> > > + *   f2fs_set_bit(7, bitmap) => 0000 0001
> > >   */
> > >  static unsigned long __find_rev_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
> > >  			unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
> > >  {
> > > -	while (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, (unsigned char *)addr))
> > > -		offset++;
> > > -
> > > -	if (offset > size)
> > > -		offset = size;
> > > -
> > > -	return offset;
> > > -#if 0
> > >  	const unsigned long *p = addr + BIT_WORD(offset);
> > >  	unsigned long result = offset & ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> > >  	unsigned long tmp;
> > > -	unsigned long mask, submask;
> > > -	unsigned long quot, rest;
> > >
> > >  	if (offset >= size)
> > >  		return size;
> > > @@ -97,14 +106,9 @@ static unsigned long __find_rev_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
> > >  	if (!offset)
> > >  		goto aligned;
> > >
> > > -	tmp = *(p++);
> > > -	quot = (offset >> 3) << 3;
> > > -	rest = offset & 0x7;
> > > -	mask = ~0UL << quot;
> > > -	submask = (unsigned char)(0xff << rest) >> rest;
> > > -	submask <<= quot;
> > > -	mask &= submask;
> > > -	tmp &= mask;
> > > +	tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > > +	tmp &= ~0UL >> offset;
> > > +
> > >  	if (size < BITS_PER_LONG)
> > >  		goto found_first;
> > >  	if (tmp)
> > > @@ -112,42 +116,34 @@ static unsigned long __find_rev_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
> > >
> > >  	size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> > >  	result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> > > +	p++;
> > >  aligned:
> > >  	while (size & ~(BITS_PER_LONG-1)) {
> > > -		tmp = *(p++);
> > > +		tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > >  		if (tmp)
> > >  			goto found_middle;
> > >  		result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> > >  		size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> > > +		p++;
> > >  	}
> > >  	if (!size)
> > >  		return result;
> > > -	tmp = *p;
> > > +
> > > +	tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > >  found_first:
> > > -	tmp &= (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> > > -	if (tmp == 0UL)		/* Are any bits set? */
> > > +	tmp &= (~0UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> > > +	if (!tmp)		/* Are any bits set? */
> > >  		return result + size;   /* Nope. */
> > >  found_middle:
> > >  	return result + __reverse_ffs(tmp);
> > > -#endif
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  static unsigned long __find_rev_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
> > >  			unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
> > >  {
> > > -	while (f2fs_test_bit(offset, (unsigned char *)addr))
> > > -		offset++;
> > > -
> > > -	if (offset > size)
> > > -		offset = size;
> > > -
> > > -	return offset;
> > > -#if 0
> > >  	const unsigned long *p = addr + BIT_WORD(offset);
> > >  	unsigned long result = offset & ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> > >  	unsigned long tmp;
> > > -	unsigned long mask, submask;
> > > -	unsigned long quot, rest;
> > >
> > >  	if (offset >= size)
> > >  		return size;
> > > @@ -157,40 +153,36 @@ static unsigned long __find_rev_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
> > >  	if (!offset)
> > >  		goto aligned;
> > >
> > > -	tmp = *(p++);
> > > -	quot = (offset >> 3) << 3;
> > > -	rest = offset & 0x7;
> > > -	mask = ~(~0UL << quot);
> > > -	submask = (unsigned char)~((unsigned char)(0xff << rest) >> rest);
> > > -	submask <<= quot;
> > > -	mask += submask;
> > > -	tmp |= mask;
> > > +	tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > > +	tmp |= ~((~0UL << offset) >> offset);
> > > +
> > >  	if (size < BITS_PER_LONG)
> > >  		goto found_first;
> > > -	if (~tmp)
> > > +	if (tmp != ~0UL)
> > >  		goto found_middle;
> > >
> > >  	size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> > >  	result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> > > +	p++;
> > >  aligned:
> > >  	while (size & ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> > > -		tmp = *(p++);
> > > -		if (~tmp)
> > > +		tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > > +		if (tmp != ~0UL)
> > >  			goto found_middle;
> > >  		result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> > >  		size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> > > +		p++;
> > >  	}
> > >  	if (!size)
> > >  		return result;
> > > -	tmp = *p;
> > >
> > > +	tmp = __reverse_ulong((unsigned char *)p);
> > >  found_first:
> > > -	tmp |= ~0UL << size;
> > > -	if (tmp == ~0UL)        /* Are any bits zero? */
> > > +	tmp |= ~(~0UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> > > +	if (tmp == ~0UL)	/* Are any bits zero? */
> > >  		return result + size;   /* Nope. */
> > >  found_middle:
> > >  	return result + __reverse_ffz(tmp);
> > > -#endif
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  void register_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> > > --
> > > 2.1.1
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ