[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201510230020.vZvDxsE7%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:36:55 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Yan Zheng <zyan@...hat.com>,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Abdul Hussain <habdul@...teon.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and
flock_lock_inode_wait
Hi Benjamin,
[auto build test WARNING on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/locks.c:1176:5: sparse: symbol 'posix_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/locks.c:1863:5: sparse: symbol 'flock_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists