[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510221423070.14856@linuxheads99>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:24:03 -0500
From: atull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fpga: socfpga: Fix check of return value of
devm_request_irq
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Moritz Fischer wrote:
Hi Moritz,
Thank you, yes this is better.
I don't know if I need to ack everything, but here it is
anyway:
Acked-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
Alan
> The return value should be checked for non-zero, instead
> of checking it being IS_ERR_VALUE().
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/socfpga.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
> index 706b80d..27d2ff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int socfpga_fpga_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, priv->irq, socfpga_fpga_isr, 0,
> dev_name(dev), priv);
> - if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return fpga_mgr_register(dev, "Altera SOCFPGA FPGA Manager",
> --
> 2.4.3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists