[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUqkJJddjhGSA8h-W0=+03gcmPSdQsLJqt5c5w4iBb=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:43:23 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@....tj>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/60] sparc/PCI: Unify pci_register_region()
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> looks like i mix the use root bus resource with parent bus resource ...
> so that still have problem.
Now will two version for patch2 and patch3 that will be used to
replace patch 2-4 in
patchset that sent out before.
v4: extend pcibios_bus_to_resource() to return pci root bus resource.
v5: add pci_find_root_bus_resource() that will use pci_find_parent_resource()
to get pci root bus resource.
if use v5, there is another patch
PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of PCIe device
need to be updated according.
Please let me know which one we should go with.
Thanks
Yinghai
View attachment "sparc_fix_range_offset_v4.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (10364 bytes)
View attachment "sparc_simplify_region_reserve_v4.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6229 bytes)
View attachment "sparc_fix_range_offset_v5.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (11053 bytes)
View attachment "sparc_simplify_region_reserve_v5.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6303 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists