[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151022224701.GA5442@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:47:01 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com, kwalker@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov@...allels.com, skozina@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for
zone_reclaimable()checks
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:42:43AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Then, isn't below change easier to backport which will also alleviate
> needlessly burning CPU cycles?
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3385,6 +3385,7 @@ retry:
> ((gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT) && pages_reclaimed < (1 << order))) {
> /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */
> wait_iff_congested(ac->preferred_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
> goto retry;
> }
Yeah, that works too. It should still be put on a dedicated wq with
MEM_RECLAIM tho.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists