lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:40:09 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo.kernel.org@...il.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
	matt.fleming@...el.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit
 builds


* Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> commit-0f96a99 introduces the following warning message:
> 
>   drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c:186:20: warning: cast to pointer
>   from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
> 
> new_memmap_phy was defined as a u64 value and casted to void*.
> This causes a warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit
> environment.
> 
> This patch changes the type of "new_memmap_phy" variable
> from "u64" into "ulong" to avoid it.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>  - change the type of "new_memmap_phy" from phys_addr_t
>    into ulong according to Ard's comment
> 
> Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c
> index 32bcb14..1f483b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ void __init efi_fake_memmap(void)
>  	u64 start, end, m_start, m_end, m_attr;
>  	int new_nr_map = memmap.nr_map;
>  	efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> -	u64 new_memmap_phy;
> +	ulong new_memmap_phy;
>  	void *new_memmap;
>  	void *old, *new;
>  	int i;

Sight, this just makes the code outright buggy in another place.

Please don't just try to 'avoid a warning', that's the wrong mindset!

You need to look at how the various values are used, what their natural types are, 
how they are used in other places, and accordingly fix the code.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ