[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5629F987.3060701@hisilicon.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:10:31 +0800
From: chenfeng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, <yudongbin@...ilicon.com>,
<saberlily.xia@...ilicon.com>, <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
<kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>, <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>,
<z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>, <puck.chen@...yun.com>,
<weidong2@...ilicon.com>, <w.f@...wei.com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <dan.zhao@...ilicon.com>, <peter.panshilin@...ilicon.com>,
<qijiwen@...ilicon.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] Add iommu driver for hi6220 SoC platform
Hi Robin,
On 2015/10/20 23:02, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 20/10/15 09:45, Chen Feng wrote:
>> iommu/hisilicon: Add hi6220-SoC smmu driver
>
>> +
>> +static int hi6220_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> + struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + dev->archdata.iommu = &iova_allocator;
>
> If the hardware doesn't offer any kind of device isolation (i.e. multiple translation contexts), then you should probably have more logic here to ensure only a single domain can ever be active at once.
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
I feel confused about your above comments. Could you help explain "ensure only a single domain can ever be active at once"?
> Robin.
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists