[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562A23B9.3090208@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:10:33 +0200
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Frias <sebastian_frias@...madesigns.com>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>,
Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] devicetree: add binding for Aurora VLSI NB8800
Ethernet controller
On 22/10/2015 16:02, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This adds a binding for the Aurora VLSI NB8800 Ethernet controller
> using the "aurora,nb8800" compatible string. When used in Sigma
> Designs chips a few additional control registers are available.
> This variant is indicated by the "sigma,smp8640-ethernet" compatible
> string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/aurora,nb8800.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/aurora,nb8800.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/aurora,nb8800.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/aurora,nb8800.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c19f615
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/aurora,nb8800.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +* Aurora VLSI AU-NB8800 Ethernet controller
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "aurora,nb8800", "sigma,smp8640-ethernet"
> + The latter indicates presence of extra features added by Sigma Designs.
I've been meaning to ask a noob question to the devicetree group
about how names for compatible strings are chosen.
Sigma Designs has two active SoC families, Tango3 (which consists of
about a dozen MIPS-based SoCs, typically named SMP86xx) and Tango4
(a few ARM-based SoCs, typically named SMP87xx). I should note that
there is no SMP8640 SoC AFAIK, rather SMP864x is a Tango3 sub-family
(I could locate 42,43,44,45,46).
AFAIK, all our SoCs are using the same Aurora NB8800 Ethernet MAC,
along with the extra features. I find it odd to use a specific SoC
model to refer to this device, instead of a more generic name.
(It's weird having to mention smp8640 in the tango4 DT.)
Would it be possible to have a compatible string which makes it
clear that it is an Aurora MAC with vendor-specific tweaks?
Something like "sigma,aurora-nb8800-mac" ?
> +- reg: Should be MMIO address space of the device
> +- interrupts: Should contain the interrupt specifier for the device
> +- interrupt-parent: Should be a phandle for the interrupt controller
> +- clocks: Should be a phandle for the clock for the device
> +
> +Common properties described in ethernet.txt:
> +- local-mac-address
> +- mac-address
> +- max-speed
> +- phy-mode
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +ethernet@...00 {
> + compatible = "aurora,nb8800";
> + reg = <0x10000 0x800>;
> + interrupts = <42>;
I thought one had to specify also whether the device sent "edge"
or "level" IRQs?
> + clocks = <&sys_clk>;
> + max-speed = <1000>;
> + phy-connection-type = "rgmii";
> +};
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists