[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562A3A17.1080800@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 06:45:59 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Enable power1_input on AMD
Carrizo
On 10/19/2015 07:28 PM, Huang Rui wrote:
> This patch enables power1_input attribute for Carrizo platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> index 41d022e..a090adf 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
> @@ -115,8 +115,11 @@ static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> {
> int n = FAM15H_MIN_NUM_ATTRS;
> struct attribute **fam15h_power_attrs;
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
>
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> + if (c->x86 == 0x15 &&
> + ((c->x86_model <= 0xf) ||
Please no unnecessary ( ).
> + (c->x86_model >= 0x60 && c->x86_model <= 0x6f)))
Those are acceptable to clarify that the && has precedence on purpose,
but "(c->x86_model <= 0xf)" is really unnecessary (and inconsistent
with the rest of the code).
> n += 1;
>
> fam15h_power_attrs = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, n,
> @@ -128,7 +131,9 @@ static int fam15h_power_init_attrs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> n = 0;
> fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_crit.attr;
> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xf)
> + if (c->x86 == 0x15 &&
> + ((c->x86_model <= 0xf) ||
> + (c->x86_model >= 0x60 && c->x86_model <= 0x6f)))
Same here.
> fam15h_power_attrs[n++] = &dev_attr_power1_input.attr;
>
> data->fam15h_power_group.attrs = fam15h_power_attrs;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists