linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151023145407.GD17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:54:07 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>, Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:42:22AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 10/23/15 5:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >So the bpf_perf_event_read() returns the count value, does this not also
> >mean that returning -EINVAL here is also 'wrong'?
> >
> >I mean, sure an actual count value that high is unlikely, but its still
> >a broken interface.
> 
> Agree. that's not pretty interface. I wish I looked at it more carefully
> when it was introduced. Now it's too late to change.

Right; and I figure changing the function signature is not done because
the eBPF stuff is ABI? Unfortunate indeed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/