[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWM2_6OmVK6oZGtZpyFY0gAkLN4uadKdZ+zqvW6T_M58w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:19:04 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@...hat.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Should audit_seccomp check audit_enabled?
I would argue that, if auditing is off, audit_seccomp shouldn't do
anything. After all, unlike e.g. selinux, seccomp is not a systemwide
policy, and seccomp signals might be ordinary behavior that's internal
to the seccomp-using application. IOW, for people with audit compiled
in and subscribed by journald but switched off, I think that the
records shouldn't be emitted.
If you agree, I can send the two-line patch.
--Andy
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists