[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+sUGsDsoef_crgETqCNMN_GFuPryHKYzAmiw0-04aYnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:54:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pstore: check PSTORE_FLAGS_FRAGILE in pstore_unregister
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com> wrote:
> When PSTORE_FLAGS_FRAGILE flag is set, only kmsg is registered in
> pstore_register. So, under these circumstances, only kmsg needs to
> be unregistered in pstore_unregister.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
Would it make more sense to have the pstore_unregister_* calls be
defensive, like kfree() is? In other words, it would be safe to call
them, even if they hadn't been registered?
Either way, I'm fine with this. Good catch!
-Kees
> ---
> fs/pstore/platform.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/platform.c b/fs/pstore/platform.c
> index 0aab920..7ad2038 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/platform.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/platform.c
> @@ -496,9 +496,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pstore_register);
>
> void pstore_unregister(struct pstore_info *psi)
> {
> - pstore_unregister_pmsg();
> - pstore_unregister_ftrace();
> - pstore_unregister_console();
> + if ((psi->flags & PSTORE_FLAGS_FRAGILE) == 0) {
> + pstore_unregister_pmsg();
> + pstore_unregister_ftrace();
> + pstore_unregister_console();
> + }
> +
> pstore_unregister_kmsg();
>
> free_buf_for_compression();
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists