linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 23/46] btrfs: fix use after free iterating extrefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151023174621.484863439@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:46:09 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 23/46] btrfs: fix use after free iterating extrefs

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>

commit dc6c5fb3b514221f2e9d21ee626a9d95d3418dff upstream.

The code for btrfs inode-resolve has never worked properly for
files with enough hard links to trigger extrefs.  It was trying to
get the leaf out of a path after freeing the path:

	btrfs_release_path(path);
	leaf = path->nodes[0];
	item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);

The fix here is to use the extent buffer we cloned just a little higher
up to avoid deadlocks caused by using the leaf in the path.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/backref.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -1786,7 +1786,6 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inu
 	int found = 0;
 	struct extent_buffer *eb;
 	struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
-	struct extent_buffer *leaf;
 	u32 item_size;
 	u32 cur_offset;
 	unsigned long ptr;
@@ -1814,9 +1813,8 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inu
 		btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(eb, BTRFS_READ_LOCK);
 		btrfs_release_path(path);
 
-		leaf = path->nodes[0];
-		item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
-		ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot);
+		item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
+		ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, slot);
 		cur_offset = 0;
 
 		while (cur_offset < item_size) {
@@ -1830,7 +1828,7 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inu
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 
-			cur_offset += btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(leaf, extref);
+			cur_offset += btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(eb, extref);
 			cur_offset += sizeof(*extref);
 		}
 		btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(eb);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/