linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 17/46] net/unix: fix logic about sk_peek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20151023174621.309936576@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:46:03 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 17/46] net/unix: fix logic about sk_peek_offset

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>

[ Upstream commit e9193d60d363e4dff75ff6d43a48f22be26d59c7 ]

Now send with MSG_PEEK can return data from multiple SKBs.

Unfortunately we take into account the peek offset for each skb,
that is wrong. We need to apply the peek offset only once.

In addition, the peek offset should be used only if MSG_PEEK is set.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> (maintainer:NETWORKING
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> (commit_signer:1/14=7%)
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Fixes: 9f389e35674f ("af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG_PEEK flag")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Tested-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1938,6 +1938,11 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct so
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
+		skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
+	else
+		skip = 0;
+
 	do {
 		int chunk;
 		struct sk_buff *skb, *last;
@@ -1984,7 +1989,6 @@ again:
 			break;
 		}
 
-		skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
 		while (skip >= unix_skb_len(skb)) {
 			skip -= unix_skb_len(skb);
 			last = skb;
@@ -2046,14 +2050,12 @@ again:
 			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
 				scm.fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);
 
-			if (skip) {
-				sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
-				skip -= chunk;
-			}
+			sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
 
 			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
 				break;
 
+			skip = 0;
 			last = skb;
 			unix_state_lock(sk);
 			skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/