[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAtun4incLV=jMbVnkdtbSxXW-7XFYnWb=6PxLnJvwHi5HSLsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 01:38:47 +0530
From: Vinayak Kale <vinayak.kale@...gate.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vinayak Kale <vinayak.kale@...il.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumit.g.gupta@...gate.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: add support for NCQ commands for SG interface
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:01:35AM +0530, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> > It looks like it'd work given that it's forcing qc->tag into
>> > tf->nsect. What's the use case tho?
>>
>> We need to issue NCQ commands with priority bit from user space application.
>>
>> BTW, Sergei Shtylyov raised concern regarding usefulness of adding
>> ATA_TFLAG_LBA to tf->flags. Can you please comment on that as well?
>> Accordingly I will either keep it or discard it in V2. Thanks.
>
> I like the change but can you please put that in a separate patch?
Ok. I'll put this in a separate patch.
> Also, can you please verify that this works fine with multiple regular
> NCQ commands in flight?
I verified that multiple FPDMA Read/Write commands issued
simultaneously by different processes, work fine.
I hooked up our application's queued Read/Write APIs to fio, ran fio
for 'random rw' over multiple processes. It worked fine.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists