linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 02/10] ASoC: img: Add driver for I2S input controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 07:57:23 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Damien Horsley <Damien.Horsley@...tec.com>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	James Hartley <James.Hartley@...tec.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 02/10] ASoC: img: Add driver for I2S
 input controller

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:09:38PM +0100, Damien Horsley wrote:
> On 19/10/15 18:47, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:40:29PM +0100, Damien Horsley wrote:

> > The APIs here all seem a bit odd - for example the enable API taking a
> > register value as an argument (normally reg is a register address BTW)
> > and returning a value but the disable API doing a read/modify/write
> > cycle.

> Sure. It reduces the number of register accesses this way, but the
> difference in execution time is not significant. Would you prefer these
> to both do read-modify-writes?

I would prefer that the functions look consistent with each other and
ideally resemble common register acceess idioms in the kernel.

> >> +static inline void img_i2s_in_flush(struct img_i2s_in *i2s)
> >> +{
> >> +	int i;
> >> +	u32 reg;
> >> +
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < i2s->active_channels; i++) {
> >> +		reg = img_i2s_in_ch_disable(i2s, i);
> >> +		reg |= IMG_I2S_IN_CH_CTL_FIFO_FLUSH_MASK;
> >> +		img_i2s_in_ch_writel(i2s, i, reg, IMG_I2S_IN_CH_CTL);
> >> +		reg &= ~IMG_I2S_IN_CH_CTL_FIFO_FLUSH_MASK;
> >> +		img_i2s_in_ch_writel(i2s, i, reg, IMG_I2S_IN_CH_CTL);
> >> +		img_i2s_in_ch_enable(i2s, i, reg);
> >> +	}
> >> +}

> > This all seems to be connected to this, which is itself slightly funky
> > especially in the context of the only user...

> They are also used during hw_params and set_format.

My point is that the flush function has only one user.

> >> +	case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
> >> +	case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
> >> +	case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
> >> +		reg = img_i2s_in_readl(i2s, IMG_I2S_IN_CTL);
> >> +		reg &= ~IMG_I2S_IN_CTL_ME_MASK;
> >> +		img_i2s_in_writel(i2s, reg, IMG_I2S_IN_CTL);
> >> +		img_i2s_in_flush(i2s);
> >> +		break;

> > ...which looks like it'll enable everything, then disable and reenable.
> > Plus needing to do a flush on trigger seems weird.

> If the FIFOs are not flushed, some samples from the previous stream will
> be transferred to the user application when the block is started again

Shouldn't we be doing that flush on stream close instead?  If nothing
else the flush is going to discard a bit of data if the stream is just
paused.

> >> +	if ((channels < 2) ||
> >> +			(channels > (i2s->max_i2s_chan * 2)) ||
> >> +			(channels % 2))
> >> +		return -EINVAL;

> > This indentation is very weird.

> Ok. What is the correct indentation for this?

Align the continuation lines of the if condition with the first line.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)