| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1445560348-29872-1-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:32:26 -0700
From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...el.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] e1000e msi-x fixes
Hi,
For this series:
Benjamin Poirier (2):
e1000e: remove unreachable code
e1000e: Fix msi-x interrupt automask
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18 ++++++------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
The first patch is a cleanup but the second one is the real deal. Please
consider reading the description for that patch before proceeding. I
believe that the following simple tracing statements are helpful in
detecting the problem fixed by the second patch.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 8881256..707a525 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -1952,6 +1952,9 @@ static irqreturn_t e1000_intr_msix_rx(int __always_unused irq, void *data)
struct net_device *netdev = data;
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
struct e1000_ring *rx_ring = adapter->rx_ring;
+ struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+
+ trace_printk("%s: rxq0 irq ims 0x%08x\n", netdev->name, er32(IMS));
/* Write the ITR value calculated at the end of the
* previous interrupt.
@@ -1966,6 +1969,7 @@ static irqreturn_t e1000_intr_msix_rx(int __always_unused irq, void *data)
adapter->total_rx_bytes = 0;
adapter->total_rx_packets = 0;
__napi_schedule(&adapter->napi);
+ trace_printk("%s: scheduling napi\n", netdev->name);
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -2672,6 +2676,8 @@ static int e1000e_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight)
struct net_device *poll_dev = adapter->netdev;
int tx_cleaned = 1, work_done = 0;
+ trace_printk("%s: poll starting ims 0x%08x\n", poll_dev->name,
+ er32(IMS));
adapter = netdev_priv(poll_dev);
if (!adapter->msix_entries ||
@@ -2689,6 +2695,8 @@ static int e1000e_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight)
e1000_set_itr(adapter);
napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
if (!test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state)) {
+ trace_printk("%s: will enable rxq0 irq\n",
+ poll_dev->name);
if (adapter->msix_entries)
ew32(IMS, adapter->rx_ring->ims_val);
else
-------- 8< --------
With that patch but without the patches in this series we can see that rx irqs
occur at unexpected times:
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns. 1986.887517: e1000e_poll: eth1: will enable rxq0 irq
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 1986.896654: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01500004
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 1986.896657: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: scheduling napi
<idle>-0 [000] d.H. 1986.896662: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01500004
<idle>-0 [000] ..s. 1986.896667: e1000e_poll: eth1: poll starting ims 0x01500004
Warning: many interrupts (2) before napi
<idle>-0 [000] ..s. 1986.896685: e1000e_poll: eth1: will enable rxq0 irq
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 1990.688870: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: scheduling napi
<idle>-0 [000] ..s. 1990.688875: e1000e_poll: eth1: poll starting ims 0x01500004
<idle>-0 [000] dNH. 1990.688913: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01500004
Warning: interrupt inside napi
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns. 1990.688916: e1000e_poll: eth1: will enable rxq0 irq
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 1990.729688: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01500004
Here's a typical sequence after applying the patches in this series. Notice
that ims is changed. Another printk at the end of e1000e_poll would show it to
be 0x01500004.
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 3896.134376: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01400004
<idle>-0 [000] d.h. 3896.134379: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: scheduling napi
<idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3896.134384: e1000e_poll: eth1: poll starting ims 0x01400004
<idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3896.134398: e1000e_poll: eth1: will enable rxq0 irq
Finally, here's the script I used to generate the warnings above:
#!/usr/bin/python3
import sys
import re
import pprint
class NaE(Exception):
"Not an Event"
pass
class Event:
def __init__(self, line):
# sample events:
# <idle>-0 [000] d.h. 2025.256536: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: rxq0 irq ims 0x01500004
# <idle>-0 [000] d.h. 2025.256539: e1000_intr_msix_rx: eth1: scheduling napi
# <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 2025.256544: e1000e_poll: eth1: poll starting ims 0x01500004
# <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 2025.256558: e1000e_poll: eth1: will enable rxq0 irq
retval = re.match(" +<?(?P<comm>.*)>?-(?P<pid>[0-9]+) +\[(?P<cpu>.*)\] (?P<flags>[^ ]+) +(?P<time>[0-9.]+): (?P<funcname>[^:]+): (?P<ifname>[^:]+): (?P<args>.*)", line)
if retval:
self.comm = retval.group("comm")
self.pid = retval.group("pid")
self.cpu = retval.group("cpu")
self.flags = retval.group("flags")
self.time = retval.group("time")
self.funcname = retval.group("funcname")
self.ifname = retval.group("ifname")
self.args = retval.group("args")
else:
raise NaE
class Machine:
pass
class State:
def __init__(self, machine):
self.machine = machine
def entry(self, event):
pass
def transition(self, event):
"self.machine should be considered read-only in transition"
return State(self.machine)
def run(self, event):
pass
def exit(self, event):
pass
def advance(self, event):
nextState = self.transition(event)
if (nextState != self):
self.exit(event)
nextState.entry(event)
nextState.run(event)
return nextState
# general receive processing machine
def enteringNapi(machine, event):
if event.args.startswith("poll starting"):
return True
else:
return False
def exitingNapi(machine, event):
if event.args.startswith("will enable"):
return True
else:
return False
class OutsideNapi(State):
def entry(self, event):
self.machine.intr = []
def transition(self, event):
if enteringNapi(self.machine, event):
return InsideNapi(self.machine)
else:
return self
def run(self, event):
if event.args.startswith("rxq0 irq"):
self.machine.intr.append(event)
def exit(self, event):
if len(self.machine.intr) > 1:
print("Warning: many interrupts (%d) before napi at %s" % (
len(self.machine.intr), event.time,))
class InsideNapi(State):
def transition(self, event):
if exitingNapi(self.machine, event):
return OutsideNapi(self.machine)
else:
return self
def run(self, event):
if event.args.startswith("rxq0 irq"):
print("Warning: interrupt inside napi")
class UnknownState(State):
def transition(self, event):
if enteringNapi(self.machine, event):
return InsideNapi(self.machine)
elif exitingNapi(self.machine, event):
return ExitingNapi(self.machine)
else:
return self
if __name__ == '__main__':
debug = False
state = UnknownState(Machine())
for line in sys.stdin:
print(line, end='')
try:
event = Event(line)
except NaE:
pass
else:
if debug:
pprinter.pprint(event)
state = state.advance(event)
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists