linux-kernel - [net-next:master 1610/1613] net/tipc/link.c:176:5: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_is_active' was not declared. Should it be static?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <201510242340.mc7bt8l1%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:11:00 +0800
From:	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Jon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
	tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next:master 1610/1613] net/tipc/link.c:176:5: sparse: symbol
 'tipc_link_is_active' was not declared. Should it be static?

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git master
head:   687f079addba1ac7f97ce97080c2291bbe8c8dce
commit: c72fa872a23f03b2b9c17e88f3b0a8070924e5f1 [1610/1613] tipc: eliminate link's reference to owner node
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        git checkout c72fa872a23f03b2b9c17e88f3b0a8070924e5f1
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

   net/tipc/link.c:166:6: sparse: symbol 'link_is_bc_sndlink' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/tipc/link.c:171:6: sparse: symbol 'link_is_bc_rcvlink' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/tipc/link.c:176:5: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_is_active' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/tipc/link.c:648:6: sparse: symbol 'link_prepare_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/tipc/link.c:904:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_advance_backlog' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/tipc/link.c:980:5: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_retrans' was not declared. Should it be static?
   net/tipc/link.c:1573:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_build_bc_init_msg' was not declared. Should it be static?
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:305:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_link_find_owner' - wrong count at exit
   net/tipc/link.c:1833:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_set' - different lock contexts for basic block
   net/tipc/link.c:2070:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_dump' - different lock contexts for basic block
   net/tipc/link.c:2141:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_get' - different lock contexts for basic block
   net/tipc/link.c:2193:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_reset_stats' - different lock contexts for basic block

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/