lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <562BACE8.8070507@intel.com> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:08:08 +0800 From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> CC: bhelgaas@...gle.com, carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, donald.c.skidmore@...el.com, eddie.dong@...el.com, nrupal.jani@...el.com, yang.z.zhang@...el.com, agraf@...e.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, qemu-devel@...gnu.org, emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, matthew.vick@...el.com, mitch.a.williams@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shannon.nelson@...el.com Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 08/12] IXGBEVF: Rework code of finding the end transmit desc of package On 10/22/2015 8:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Do you really need to play the shifting games? > Can't you just reset everything and re-initialize the rings? > It's slower but way less intrusive. > Also removes the need to track writes into rings. Shift ring is to avoid losing those packets in the ring. This may cause some race condition and so I introduced a lock to prevent such cases in the latter patch. Yes, reset everything after migration can make thing easy. But just like you said it would affect performance and loss more packets. I can do a test later to get data about these two way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists