lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <562ADAB1.4020400@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 18:11:13 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review On 10/23/2015 04:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:34:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 10/23/2015 11:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release. >>> There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun Oct 25 17:46:11 UTC 2015. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc1.gz >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> >> I am seeing the following compile error (was seen in 4.2.4-rc1) >> >> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0, >> from include/linux/stddef.h:4, >> from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4, >> from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13, >> from include/linux/types.h:5, >> from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16, >> from include/linux/capability.h:15, >> from include/linux/sched.h:15, >> from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: >> drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’: >> drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function >> ‘should_resched’ >> && should_resched())) { >> ^ >> include/linux/compiler.h:164:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’ >> # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) >> ^ >> In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:18:0, >> from include/linux/spinlock.h:50, >> from include/linux/seqlock.h:35, >> from include/linux/time.h:5, >> from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56, >> from include/linux/timex.h:56, >> from include/linux/sched.h:19, >> from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12: >> ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here >> static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset) >> ^ >> scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed >> make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed >> make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2 >> Makefile:947: recipe for target 'drivers' failed >> make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > Also for powerpc: arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c: In function 'kvmppc_run_vcpu': arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:2181:3: error: too few arguments to function 'should_resched' [ Didn't we have that before ? ] Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists