lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562CC926.1080700@kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:20:54 +0000
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:	Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc:	stefan@...er.ch, b38611@...escale.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: vf610_adc: Fix division by zero error

On 19/10/15 08:43, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> In case the fsl,adck-max-frequency property is not present in
> the device tree, a division by zero error results during the
> probe call on kernel boot (see below). This patch fixes it and
> also restores device tree compatibility in case kernels are
> booting with old device trees without this property specified.
> 
> [    1.063229] Division by zero in kernel.
> [    1.067152] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted
> 4.3.0-rc5-00212-gcc88cef #37
> [    1.074650] Hardware name: Freescale Vybrid VF5xx/VF6xx (Device Tree)
> [    1.081135] Backtrace:
> [    1.083694] [<800134a4>] (dump_backtrace) from [<8001369c>]
> (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
> [    1.091340]  r7:00000008 r6:8e0ae210 r5:00000000 r4:8e299800
> [    1.097146] [<80013684>] (show_stack) from [<80297b1c>]
> (dump_stack+0x24/0x28)
> [    1.104483] [<80297af8>] (dump_stack) from [<80013608>]
> (__div0+0x1c/0x20)
> [    1.111421] [<800135ec>] (__div0) from [<802968b4>] (Ldiv0+0x8/0x10)
> [    1.117865] [<80424350>] (vf610_adc_probe) from [<803153b4>]
> (platform_drv_probe+0x4c/0xac)
> [    1.126311]  r10:00000000 r9:8076a5ec r8:00000000 r7:fffffdfb
> r6:807cc67c r5:8e0ae210
> [    1.134319]  r4:807f6c54
> [    1.136915] [<80315368>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<803138bc>]
> (driver_probe_device+0x20c/0x2f8)
> [    1.145882]  r7:807cc67c r6:00000000 r5:8e0ae210 r4:807f6c54
> [    1.151657] [<803136b0>] (driver_probe_device) from [<80313a3c>]
> (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
> [    1.160190]  r9:8076a5ec r8:00000098 r7:00000000 r6:8e0ae244
> r5:807cc67c r4:8e0ae210
> [    1.168112] [<803139a8>] (__driver_attach) from [<80311cb8>]
> (bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xa4)
> [    1.176383]  r7:00000000 r6:803139a8 r5:807cc67c r4:00000000
> [    1.182159] [<80311c48>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<80313318>]
> (driver_attach+0x24/0x28)
> [    1.190260]  r6:807bb568 r5:8e2a5b00 r4:807cc67c
> [    1.194996] [<803132f4>] (driver_attach) from [<80312f50>]
> (bus_add_driver+0x1a4/0x21c)
> [    1.203113] [<80312dac>] (bus_add_driver) from [<803142a8>]
> (driver_register+0x80/0x100)
> [    1.211275]  r7:8e2a7dc0 r6:807a8160 r5:80789e14 r4:807cc67c
> [    1.217075] [<80314228>] (driver_register) from [<803152f8>]
> (__platform_driver_register+0x5c/0x64)
> [    1.226216]  r5:80789e14 r4:807a8160
> [    1.229877] [<8031529c>] (__platform_driver_register) from
> [<80789e30>] (vf610_adc_driver_init+0x1c/0x20)
> [    1.239556] [<80789e14>] (vf610_adc_driver_init) from [<800095f8>]
> (do_one_initcall+0x94/0x1dc)
> [    1.248365] [<80009564>] (do_one_initcall) from [<8076ae34>]
> (kernel_init_freeable+0x13c/0x1e0)
> [    1.257155]  r10:80794830 r9:8076a5ec r8:00000098 r7:807d5780
> r6:807d5780 r5:00000006
> [    1.265153]  r4:807a0ee8
> [    1.267753] [<8076acf8>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<80590ef0>]
> (kernel_init+0x18/0xf0)
> [    1.276021]  r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:00000000
> r6:00000000 r5:80590ed8
> [    1.284015]  r4:807d5780
> [    1.286615] [<80590ed8>] (kernel_init) from [<8000f878>]
> (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c)
> [    1.294278]  r5:80590ed8 r4:00000000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
I'd like an ack from Fugang on this as I'm less than entirely
sure what the current logic is doing!

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> index 6bf4c20..bf4f3d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ static inline void vf610_adc_calculate_rates(struct vf610_adc *info)
>  		adc_feature->clk_div = 8;
>  	}
>  
> +	adck_rate = ipg_rate / info->adc_feature.clk_div;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Determine the long sample time adder value to be used based
>  	 * on the default minimum sample time provided.
> @@ -217,7 +219,6 @@ static inline void vf610_adc_calculate_rates(struct vf610_adc *info)
>  	 * BCT (Base Conversion Time): fixed to 25 ADCK cycles for 12 bit mode
>  	 * LSTAdder(Long Sample Time): 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 ADCK cycles
>  	 */
> -	adck_rate = ipg_rate / info->adc_feature.clk_div;
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_hw_avgs); i++)
>  		info->sample_freq_avail[i] =
>  			adck_rate / (6 + vf610_hw_avgs[i] *
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ