[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151025152637.GA1399@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:26:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc: nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 1/3] nbd: nbd_thread_send: remove the unnecessary
kernel_dequeue_signal()
nbd_thread_send() does kernel_dequeue_signal() at the end for no reason,
it is fine to exit with the pending SIGKILL.
Not sure it really needs another kernel_dequeue_signal() inside the
main loop, we know that signal_pending() means SIGKILL. But probably
we want to clear TIF_SIGPENDING before sock_shutdown().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
drivers/block/nbd.c | 4 ----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
index b85e7a0..e5d96e5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -586,10 +586,6 @@ static int nbd_thread_send(void *data)
nbd->task_send = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nbd->tasks_lock, flags);
- /* Clear maybe pending signals */
- if (signal_pending(current))
- kernel_dequeue_signal(NULL);
-
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists