lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151025104145.GE27558@thunk.org> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:41:45 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:33:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Hm, that's weird - all our sched_*() system call APIs that set task scheduling > priorities are fundamentally per thread, not per process. Same goes for the old > sys_nice() interface. The scheduler has no real notion of 'process', and certainly > not at the system call level. > I suspect the main issue is that the games programmers were trying to access it via libc / pthreads, which hides a lot of the power available at the raw syscall level. This is probably more of a "tutorial needed for userspace programmers" issue, at a guess. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists