lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <36DF59CE26D8EE47B0655C516E9CE6402865F153@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 01:33:10 +0000 From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com> To: "Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com> CC: "kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>, "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events Hi, Fengguang, I've forgotten to add --thread-shallow when doing git format-patch, thanks! Best Regards, Yu > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pm-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm- > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Fengguang Wu > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 9:22 AM > To: Chen, Yu C > Cc: kbuild-all@...org; rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; Zhang, Rui; > Zheng, Lv; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux- > pm@...r.kernel.org; stable@...r.kernel.org; Li, Philip > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:08:29AM +0800, Chen, Yu C wrote: > > This should not be a valid warning IMO, because PATCH 2/3 is based on > > PATCH 1/3, and the warning of implicit declaration is defined in PATCH > > 1/3. > > Yes sorry, the robot treats the patchset as 3 independent patches: > > 2754 N L Oct 25 Chen Yu ( 34:0) [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq > when waiting for events > 2756 N L Oct 25 Chen Yu ( 52:0) [PATCH 3/3][v2] ACPI / PM: Fix incorrect > wakeup irq setting before suspend-to-idle > 2757 N L Oct 25 Chen Yu ( 75:0) [PATCH 1/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq > when uninstalling acpi irq handler > > And the root cause is, the 3 patches are likely sent one by one _out of order_. > And there is no in-reply-to field to help reorder them into a logical patchset. > > Thanks, > Fengguang > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: lkp > > > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 1:19 AM > > > To: Chen, Yu C > > > Cc: kbuild-all@...org; rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; Zhang, > > > Rui; Zheng, Lv; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux- pm@...r.kernel.org; Chen, Yu C; > > > stable@...r.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting > > > for events > > > > > > Hi Chen, > > > > > > [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate > > > base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chen-Yu/ACPI-Using- > > > correct-irq-when-waiting-for-events/20151025-010210 > > > config: x86_64-randconfig-x015-201543 (attached as .config) > > > reproduce: > > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > > make ARCH=x86_64 > > > > > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0, > > > from include/linux/stddef.h:4, > > > from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4, > > > from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13, > > > from include/linux/types.h:5, > > > from include/linux/list.h:4, > > > from include/linux/module.h:9, > > > from drivers/acpi/osl.c:26: > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'acpi_os_wait_events_complete': > > > >> drivers/acpi/osl.c:1183:6: error: implicit declaration of > > > >> function > > > 'acpi_sci_irq_valid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > if (acpi_sci_irq_valid()) > > > ^ > > > include/linux/compiler.h:147:28: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if' > > > if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) : \ > > > ^ > > > >> drivers/acpi/osl.c:1183:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if' > > > if (acpi_sci_irq_valid()) > > > ^ > > > >> drivers/acpi/osl.c:1184:23: error: 'acpi_sci_irq' undeclared > > > >> (first use in this > > > function) > > > synchronize_hardirq(acpi_sci_irq); > > > ^ > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:1184:23: note: each undeclared identifier is > > > reported only once for each function it appears in > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > > > > vim +/acpi_sci_irq_valid +1183 drivers/acpi/osl.c > > > > > > 1177 void acpi_os_wait_events_complete(void) > > > 1178 { > > > 1179 /* > > > 1180 * Make sure the GPE handler or the fixed event > handler is > > > not used > > > 1181 * on another CPU after removal. > > > 1182 */ > > > > 1183 if (acpi_sci_irq_valid()) > > > > 1184 synchronize_hardirq(acpi_sci_irq); > > > 1185 flush_workqueue(kacpid_wq); > > > 1186 flush_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq); > > > 1187 } > > > > > > --- > > > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in the > body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists