[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562E132B.7080407@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:48:59 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf tools: Don't set inherit bit for system wide
evsel
On 2015/10/26 17:25, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 26/10/15 11:08, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>>
>> evsel->system_wide is introduced by commit
>> bf8e8f4b832972c76d64ab2e2837a48397144887
>> (perf evlist: Add 'system_wide' option), but Adrian only introduced a new field
>> into perf, doesn't really make it active. Until now the only user of it is
>> arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c, but I'm not very sure the reason for IPT to use that
>> field.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, it should be okay for a normal system wide evsel
>> to have
>> this var set. I'll try another RFC for it.
> evsel->system_wide is for mixing evsels that aren't system-wide with ones
> that are.
>
> It might work to set it for all system-wide evsels but you will have to
> check the code and test it, because that would be using it in a new way
> that has never been tested.
I have check all occurance of system_wide I can found and found
only one behavior change which I believe should be okay. Please
have a look at [1].
Thank you.
[1]
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1445859720-146146-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists