[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151026122825.GS2508@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:28:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait)
implementation
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:04:26PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:28:07AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The thing about the wake_up_state() return value; I think we can ignore it.
> > + *
> > + * If for some reason it would return 0, that means the previously waiting
> > + * task is already running, so it will observe condition true (or has already).
> > + */
> > +void swake_up_locked(struct swait_queue_head *q)
> > +{
> > + struct swait_queue *curr;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(curr, &q->task_list, task_list) {
> > + wake_up_process(curr->task);
> > + list_del_init(&curr->task_list);
> > + break;
>
> Just be curious, what's this break for? Or what's this loop(?) for?
Lazy way of writing: if (!empty) { curr = first-entry;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists