linux-kernel - [PATCHv2] blk-integrity: empty implementation when disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1445879006-7975-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:03:26 -0600
From:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2] blk-integrity: empty implementation when disabled

This patch moves the blk_integrity_payload definition outside the
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTERITY dependency and provides empty function
implementations when the kernel configuration disables integrity
extensions. This simplifies drivers that make use of these to map user
data so they don't need to repeat the same configuration checks.

Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
---
v1 -> v2: Fixed corrupted patch and subject line spelling error

 include/linux/bio.h |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index b9b6e04..f0c46d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -318,16 +318,6 @@ enum bip_flags {
 	BIP_IP_CHECKSUM		= 1 << 4, /* IP checksum */
 };
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY)
-
-static inline struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity(struct bio *bio)
-{
-	if (bio->bi_rw & REQ_INTEGRITY)
-		return bio->bi_integrity;
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * bio integrity payload
  */
@@ -349,6 +339,16 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload {
 	struct bio_vec		bip_inline_vecs[0];/* embedded bvec array */
 };
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY)
+
+static inline struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity(struct bio *bio)
+{
+	if (bio->bi_rw & REQ_INTEGRITY)
+		return bio->bi_integrity;
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static inline bool bio_integrity_flagged(struct bio *bio, enum bip_flags flag)
 {
 	struct bio_integrity_payload *bip = bio_integrity(bio);
@@ -795,6 +795,18 @@ static inline bool bio_integrity_flagged(struct bio *bio, enum bip_flags flag)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline void *bio_integrity_alloc(struct bio * bio, gfp_t gfp,
+								unsigned int nr)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
+					unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY */
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK */
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/