[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151026174542.GA6567@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:45:42 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/52] perf tools: Add thread_map event
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:42:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> > PERF_RECORD_AUXTRACE_ERROR = 72,
> > + PERF_RECORD_THREAD_MAP = 73,
> > PERF_RECORD_HEADER_MAX
> > };
> >
> > @@ -356,6 +357,17 @@ struct context_switch_event {
> > u32 next_prev_tid;
> > };
> >
> > +struct thread_map_data_event {
>
> Humm, I think "data" here is way too vague here, how about
> "thread_map_event_entry"?
>
> Moving of "entry" to the end also helps in understanding that this is
> not an "event" per se, it doesn't have the perv_event_header, etc, its
> just an entry in a 'struct thread_map_event'.
>
> I'm tentatively doing this change in my local branch, please let me know
> if you have any reason to object to such a change,
np, hope there's not much dependency on this later
in patchset ;-) probably not..
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists