linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:00:11 -0700
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

On 10/26/2015 03:11 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The get_maintainer.pl script could be used to get a list of people that
> has to be in the copy list when posting patches for a given file but it
> defaults to git fallback so the list returned isn't really relevant and
> submitters are posting patches to random developers that just happened
> to touch that file in the past.
>
> Disable git fallback so get_maintainer.pl only returns the information
> that is in MAINTAINERS by default.
>
> Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> This patch was suggested by Wolfram on this thread [0] but it is
> something I thought before because I've seen people complaining
> on a regular basis about being cc'ed in random patches and there
> are tools like patman [1] that rely on get_maintainers.pl to post
> the patches.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/26/444
> [1]: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=tools/patman/README
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
>

We might need to do a sweep of files to make sure more of them are
listed in the maintainers file, else by default they only show LKML.
As an example, a bunch of files in lib are only showing LKML.
Defaulting to only sending to LKML may be swinging too far in the wrong
direction for reducing inbox size.

>   scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> index 98bae869f6d0..b52ae26270e8 100755
> --- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> +++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ my $email_git = 0;
>   my $email_git_all_signature_types = 0;
>   my $email_git_blame = 0;
>   my $email_git_blame_signatures = 1;
> -my $email_git_fallback = 1;
> +my $email_git_fallback = 0;
>   my $email_git_min_signatures = 1;
>   my $email_git_max_maintainers = 5;
>   my $email_git_min_percent = 5;
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/