linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 65/86] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1445981426-19727-66-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:30:05 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 65/86] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0

3.19.8-ckt9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>

commit 9d9240756e63dd87d6cbf5da8b98ceb8f8192b55 upstream.

Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function
0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of pci_get_slot().
Generally this works because we're fairly well guaranteed that a PCIe
device is at slot address 0, but for the general case, including
conventional PCI, it's incorrect.  We need to get the slot and then convert
it back into a devfn.

Fixes: 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0")
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/pci/access.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index 7f249b9..2f15e7b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -355,7 +355,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_pci22_ops = {
 static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 			       void *arg)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	if (!tdev)
@@ -369,7 +370,8 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 				const void *arg)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	if (!tdev)
@@ -388,7 +390,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_f0_ops = {
 
 static int pci_vpd_f0_dev_check(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!tdev)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/