[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrViit0LaXEcSOZHF99gdEbFDPGwLoO6q6aCfq2okToC7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:52:54 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: sigcontext fixes, again
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
> 26.10.2015 04:25, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
>> This is take 2 at fixing x86 64-bit signals wrt SS. After a lot of
>> thought, this is not controlled by any flags -- I would much prefer
>> to avoid opt-in behavior. Instead, it just tries hard to avoid
>> triggering the cases that break DOSEMU.
>>
>> Stas, this now seems to pass the test you sent me. It works with
>> stock dosemu2 (I haven't tested classic dosemu because I can't get it
>> to work regardless).
> I'll test it myself then.
> But this will have to wait till a week-end I am afraid.
> In a mean time you can test vm86() - last time I tried,
> I got oops and hard lockup.
Can you tell me exactly what kernel version (release by Linus or
commit hash) oopses and, if it's easy, post a screenshot or log?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists