[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562F42B1.30102@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:24:01 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] dmaengine: tegra-adma: Add support for Tegra210
ADMA
On 27/10/15 02:10, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:35:19AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> +static inline void tdma_ch_write(struct tegra_adma_chan *tdc,
>> + u32 reg, u32 val)
>
> Coding style issue here
Yes will correct.
>> +static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
>> +{
>> + struct tegra_adma_chan *tdc = to_tegra_adma_chan(dc);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync() return postive values on success too, so this can
> fail. This check should be for less than zero case
I stumbled upon that recently and will also fix up.
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists