[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151027101022.GA5828@x1>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:10:22 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Anyone south of Wolfram and north of the I2C ML is unlikely to care.
>
> Actually, driver maintainers should care about their portion of it.
> Which leads me to the conclusion that driver maintainer entries in
> MAINTAINERS should have the relevant Kconfig symbol as a keyword match,
> probably.
Good point, well put. Although this situation is fairly unique to
Kconfig changes. In general I know I don't want to be spammed with
changes to all the files I've ever adapted though. If people wish to
act as reviewers, they should have a mention in MAINTAINERS for
get_maintiner.pl to pull information from:
R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@...ain>
These reviewers should be CCed on patches.
Or a new marker, I: Interested parties.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists