linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/pinctrl: Add the concept of an "init" state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZNBe8P8-FMyQd2E4ieJ2Bck9tgnzAiZqLGWVf8bW6W8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:25:19 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/pinctrl: Add the concept of an "init" state

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> For pinctrl the "default" state is applied to pins before the driver's
> probe function is called.  This is normally a sensible thing to do,
> but in some cases can cause problems.  That's because the pins will
> change state before the driver is given a chance to program how those
> pins should behave.
>
> As an example you might have a regulator that is controlled by a PWM
> (output high = high voltage, output low = low voltage).  The firmware
> might leave this pin as driven high.  If we allow the driver core to
> reconfigure this pin as a PWM pin before the PWM's probe function runs
> then you might end up running at too low of a voltage while we probe.
>
> Let's introudce a new "init" state.  If this is defined we'll set
> pinctrl to this state before probe and then "default" after probe
> (unless the driver explicitly changed states already).
>
> An alternative idea that was thought of was to use the pre-existing
> "sleep" or "idle" states and add a boolean property that we should
> start in that mode.  This was not done because the "init" state is
> needed for correctness and those other states are only present (and
> only transitioned in to and out of) when (optional) power management
> is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Tested-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/