linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 8/9] eeprom: at24: remove a reduntant if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1445946233-6071-9-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:43:52 +0100
From:	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] eeprom: at24: remove a reduntant if

It seems as if the second check for I2C_FUNC_I2C functionality had been
introduced accidentally during a merge. Tt's reduntant, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 387d134..65f1479 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -619,10 +619,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 		} else {
 			return -EPFNOSUPPORT;
 		}
-	}
 
-	/* Use I2C operations unless we're stuck with SMBus extensions. */
-	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
 		if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
 				I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_I2C_BLOCK)) {
 			use_smbus_write = I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/