linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:09:34 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	"Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	linux acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power
 Idle(LPI) states

Hi Prashanth,

On 27/10/15 00:21, Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> While testing with these patches everything looked fine except that we
> are flattening all the LPI
> states even if it is disabled. I added a simple check to fix it. Please
> let me know if you have any
> feedback on the same.
>

Looks good to me and thanks for the nice catch. I completely missed to
handle that case. Is it OK if I fold this patch into the next version ?

I have worked on Ashwin's comments, but was waiting to get some feedback
from Rafael before I post newer version.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/