| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <562F859E.4010105@arm.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:09:34 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> To: "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@...eaurora.org>, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Hi Prashanth, On 27/10/15 00:21, Prakash, Prashanth wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > While testing with these patches everything looked fine except that we > are flattening all the LPI > states even if it is disabled. I added a simple check to fix it. Please > let me know if you have any > feedback on the same. > Looks good to me and thanks for the nice catch. I completely missed to handle that case. Is it OK if I fold this patch into the next version ? I have worked on Ashwin's comments, but was waiting to get some feedback from Rafael before I post newer version. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists