[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1445957749.1388742.421558841.29441B00@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:55:49 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Inline hunt results for 4.3.0-rc1
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 15:32, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> I have created a set of semi-automated scripts which look for
> large inlines in the kernel.
>
> Recently I taught it to even generate "git format-patch" patches
> (unfortunately, only for inlines in *.c files, not *.h),
> and here are they for 4.3.0-rc1 - i.e. current Linus tree.
>
> Submitting 300+ patches separately would amount to spamming,
> instead I encourage people to take a look at the patches
> on the Web:
>
> http://busybox.net/~vda/inline_hunt/4.3.0-rc1/
> http://busybox.net/~vda/inline_hunt/4.3.0-rc1/README
>
> and in particular, at the set of most juicy patches, each of which
> shaves off more than 1000 bytes off its *.c module:
>
> http://busybox.net/~vda/inline_hunt/4.3.0-rc1/patch_saves1000/
Does gcc -finline-limit=2000 somehow has the same effect?
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists