[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151027154424.GG1689@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:44:24 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...escale.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:37:29AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:52:24AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> > > On 15/10/15 14:02, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> index bcee7abac68e..6039d1eb5912 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> > >> @@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
> > >> __asm__ __volatile__( \
> > >> ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
> > >> CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
> > >> - " mov %w2, %w1\n" \
> > >> - "0: ldxr"B" %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> - "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "0: ldxr"B" %w2, [%3]\n" \
> > >> + "1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
> > >> " cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
> > >> " mov %w0, %w4\n" \
> > >> "2:\n" \
> > >> + " mov %w1, %w2\n" \
> > >> " .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
> > >> " .align 2\n" \
> > >> "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
> >
> > On the second thought looks like we still update *data in case stxr
> > fails (or I need more coffee).
>
> I'm on the second cup and I see the same problem. Even if stxr fails, we
> fall back through "mov %w1, %w2", so *data is always updated with the
> loaded value. Maybe something like below on top of Will's patch:
Yeah, sorry, my original patch was an untested mess. I think we can avoid
the "cc" clobber by adding a branch to the slow-path, as below.
Still needs testing, mind.
Will
--->8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index 6039d1eb5912..937f5e58a4d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -288,17 +288,19 @@ static void register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
"1: stxr"B" %w0, %w1, [%3]\n" \
" cbz %w0, 2f\n" \
" mov %w0, %w4\n" \
+ " b 3f\n" \
"2:\n" \
" mov %w1, %w2\n" \
+ "3:\n" \
" .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
" .align 2\n" \
- "3: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
- " b 2b\n" \
+ "4: mov %w0, %w5\n" \
+ " b 3b\n" \
" .popsection" \
" .pushsection __ex_table,\"a\"\n" \
" .align 3\n" \
- " .quad 0b, 3b\n" \
- " .quad 1b, 3b\n" \
+ " .quad 0b, 4b\n" \
+ " .quad 1b, 4b\n" \
" .popsection\n" \
ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN, \
CONFIG_ARM64_PAN) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists