[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYOMyhz_6G15UkLbp5Jo=7k98_i8p6NUgzOev=gCWNyDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:18:02 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] pinctrl: at91: add missing of_node_put
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so
> a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
>
> for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> ... when != of_node_put(child)
> when != e = child
> (
> return child;
> |
> + of_node_put(child);
> ? return ...;
> )
> ...
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Patch applied with Ludovic's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists