linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpufeature: Add CLZERO feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:48:02 -0500
From:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<tony.luck@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <luto@...nel.org>, <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>, <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>,
	Wan Zongshun <Vincent.Wan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpufeature: Add CLZERO feature

On 10/26/2015 8:09 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> you called it "AMD
> extended features 2" - then those should really go into into the
> x86_capability array, i.e., like you've done it in your initial version.
>
> So please fix the SOB chain of your initial patch and send that one out.
>
>

Forgot to ask earlier about this-
Shall I still sanitize the comments to say "AMD extended features 1" for 
0x80000001,ecx
and "AMD extended features 2" for 0x80000008, ebx?

Or let it be as in initial version?

Thanks,
-Aravind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/