linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/70] cpufreq: interactive: don't drop speed if recently at higher load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1445967059-6897-5-git-send-email-czoborbalint@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:29:53 +0100
From:	Bálint Czobor <czoborbalint@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
	Bálint Czobor <czoborbalint@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/70] cpufreq: interactive: don't drop speed if recently at higher load

From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>

Apply min_sample_time to the last time the current target speed
was originally requested or re-validated as appropriate for the
current load, not to the time since the current speed was
originally set.  Avoids periodic dips in speed during bursty
loads.

Change-Id: I250bda657985de60373f9897cc41f480664d51a1
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Bálint Czobor <czoborbalint@...il.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c |   38 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
index 12345c7b..59e7779a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ struct cpufreq_interactive_cpuinfo {
 	u64 idle_exit_time;
 	u64 timer_run_time;
 	int idling;
-	u64 freq_change_time;
-	u64 freq_change_time_in_idle;
+	u64 target_set_time;
+	u64 target_set_time_in_idle;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
 	unsigned int target_freq;
@@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ static void cpufreq_interactive_timer(unsigned long data)
 	else
 		cpu_load = 100 * (delta_time - delta_idle) / delta_time;
 
-	delta_idle = (unsigned int)(now_idle - pcpu->freq_change_time_in_idle);
-	delta_time = (unsigned int)(pcpu->timer_run_time - pcpu->freq_change_time);
+	delta_idle = (unsigned int)(now_idle - pcpu->target_set_time_in_idle);
+	delta_time = (unsigned int)(pcpu->timer_run_time -
+				    pcpu->target_set_time);
 
 	if ((delta_time == 0) || (delta_idle > delta_time))
 		load_since_change = 0;
@@ -188,19 +189,12 @@ static void cpufreq_interactive_timer(unsigned long data)
 
 	new_freq = pcpu->freq_table[index].frequency;
 
-	if (pcpu->target_freq == new_freq)
-	{
-		trace_cpufreq_interactive_already(data, cpu_load,
-						  pcpu->target_freq, new_freq);
-		goto rearm_if_notmax;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Do not scale down unless we have been at this frequency for the
 	 * minimum sample time.
 	 */
 	if (new_freq < pcpu->target_freq) {
-		if (pcpu->timer_run_time - pcpu->freq_change_time
+		if (pcpu->timer_run_time - pcpu->target_set_time
 		    < min_sample_time) {
 			trace_cpufreq_interactive_notyet(data, cpu_load,
 					 pcpu->target_freq, new_freq);
@@ -208,6 +202,15 @@ static void cpufreq_interactive_timer(unsigned long data)
 		}
 	}
 
+	pcpu->target_set_time_in_idle = now_idle;
+	pcpu->target_set_time = pcpu->timer_run_time;
+
+	if (pcpu->target_freq == new_freq) {
+		trace_cpufreq_interactive_already(data, cpu_load,
+						  pcpu->target_freq, new_freq);
+		goto rearm_if_notmax;
+	}
+
 	trace_cpufreq_interactive_target(data, cpu_load, pcpu->target_freq,
 					 new_freq);
 
@@ -394,10 +397,6 @@ static int cpufreq_interactive_up_task(void *data)
 							max_freq,
 							CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
 			mutex_unlock(&set_speed_lock);
-
-			pcpu->freq_change_time_in_idle =
-				get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu,
-						     &pcpu->freq_change_time);
 			trace_cpufreq_interactive_up(cpu, pcpu->target_freq,
 						     pcpu->policy->cur);
 		}
@@ -443,9 +442,6 @@ static void cpufreq_interactive_freq_down(struct work_struct *work)
 						CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
 
 		mutex_unlock(&set_speed_lock);
-		pcpu->freq_change_time_in_idle =
-			get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu,
-					     &pcpu->freq_change_time);
 		trace_cpufreq_interactive_down(cpu, pcpu->target_freq,
 					       pcpu->policy->cur);
 	}
@@ -575,9 +571,9 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_interactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 			pcpu->policy = policy;
 			pcpu->target_freq = policy->cur;
 			pcpu->freq_table = freq_table;
-			pcpu->freq_change_time_in_idle =
+			pcpu->target_set_time_in_idle =
 				get_cpu_idle_time_us(j,
-					     &pcpu->freq_change_time);
+					     &pcpu->target_set_time);
 			pcpu->governor_enabled = 1;
 			smp_wmb();
 		}
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/