linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PM / suspend: replacing printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvwkk+DJ+AACoC6dG4M4jtnW=F=Qm082hFJHQSYoujc6PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:26:54 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / suspend: replacing printk

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com> wrote:
> replacing prink(s) with appropriate pr_info and pr_err
>
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/power/suspend.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

In which way does this patch improve the existing code?
You describe what it does but not which problem it solves and
why this patch is necessary.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/