[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but
> are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far
> that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that
> agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition)
> Reviewers -- go figure.
>
I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :)
If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that
maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any
problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review.
In that case, that would be:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists